When it comes to giving or buying toys for your children, do you have no problems buying them the expensive kinds or do you shop around for the cheapest toys or imitations of it?
This is a debate between some parents I know. On one hand, there is a group of parents that would rather give their kids cheaper toys, knowing that they will outgrow this. Cheap toys call for cheap thrills. With children’s attention spans, it would be a miracle if they invested in the toy for a whole month, let alone a whole week.
On the other hand, there are mothers who really spend for quality toys for their kids because these are better crafted and the likelihood of the toys becoming a health hazard diminishes. They also last longer, which can be an investment especially if these have to be shared with younger siblings. Some parents argue that expensive toys really have more value. They are so well constructed that it also helps with the child’s growth and development.
Cheap toys are all believed to be made in China, and there have been plenty of toys from China which have been recalled for bad quality.
A child with a really expensive toy can learn to value his items. With a cheaper toy, one that easily breaks, he may not be able to grasp the idea of taking care of his things.
Which side are you on, in this discussion? And what are most inclined to buy for your children?
Tags: buying toys, cheap thrills, cheap toys, China, expensive toys, growth and development, health hazard, imitations, likelihood, miracle, parents, younger siblings